Edits you make to a Topic *can* travel back to the Playbook the Review came from — Libra asks you every time. Pick **Only this review** unless you really want the next matter to inherit the change.
## How the result screen is laid out
The Review opens on three panes.
On the left, a sidebar with two tabs: **Results**, listing every Topic with its number and a coloured risk icon, and **Documents**, listing the files the Review ran against. Clicking a Topic in the list scrolls to it.
In the middle, the Topics themselves, numbered `01`, `02`, `03` and laid out one after another. Each one carries its risk badge, a **Reasoning** paragraph, and a **Positions** section.
On the right, the document viewer. It opens when you click a citation, and shows the cited page with the passage highlighted.
Above all three sits the header strip: the Review title, **Author**, **Updated**, an **Export** button, and either **Save as Playbook** or a **Saved as Playbook** marker.
### The levels of a result
```text theme={null}
Review
└── Topic ← risk badge + Reasoning + Positions
└── Position ← Starting / Fallback / Not acceptable, each with a Met count
└── Rule ← outcome badge + reasoning + inline citations
```
Topics are laid out expanded, so you scroll rather than click to read them. Positions start collapsed: click a position row to open the rules underneath it.
## Topic risk badges
Every Topic that finished gets one badge.
| Badge | Meaning |
| --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **No risk** | The contract meets the **Starting position** in full, and trips none of the **Not acceptable** rules. |
| **Medium risk** | Anything in between — partial coverage of the Starting position, a **Fallback position** carrying the weight instead, or forbidden wording that shows up but is outweighed by the wording you wanted. |
| **High risk** | The **Not acceptable position** matches at least as well as every other position on the Topic. The forbidden wording is as present as the wording you asked for. |
| **Not found** | Nothing in the uploaded documents was judgeable for this Topic. The Topic body says so: *"No matching content found in the uploaded documents for this topic."* |
Two details of the rollup are worth knowing, because they change how you read a badge:
**No risk is a strict gate.** It needs both halves — the Starting position fully met *and* no rule met on any Not acceptable position. A contract that satisfies every rule you wanted but also contains a clause you forbade is not No risk. Fallback positions are deliberately left out of this gate; meeting a Fallback rather than the Starting position is a Medium-risk outcome, not a clean one.
**High risk is a comparison, not a threshold.** Libra scores each position by the proportion of its judged rules the contract meets, then asks whether a Not acceptable position scores at least as high as every other position on the Topic. So a Topic with no judgeable Not acceptable rules can never come out High risk: it is either No risk, if it clears the gate above, or Medium risk — however thin the coverage is.
While a Topic is still being evaluated it carries no badge at all — its card shows a placeholder shimmer, and its row in the left sidebar shows a spinner. A Topic that errored shows **Failed**, and you can re-run just that Topic.