Skip to main content
Review is the depth tool. Where Discovery scans many documents at once, Review goes deep on a single contract — typically a draft you’ve received from the counterparty, and you want to know whether it actually fits your standards. The check runs against a Review template: your firm’s framework for a particular contract type, like an employment contract, an NDA, or a service agreement. Once a template exists, Libra reads the contract clause by clause, evaluates the contract against every Rule in your template, gives each Topic a pass or fail, and points you straight to the relevant spot in the document.

What’s in a Review template

A template is built in three nested layers — Topics at the top, Positions inside each Topic, Rules inside each Position.
LayerWhat it is
TopicA subject of negotiation. Working hours, Place of work, Termination. A template usually has a handful, one for each clause you actually negotiate.
PositionInside a Topic, a Position is the wording you’d sign for it. Every Topic has an Acceptable position (the clause you’d love to see), optional Fallback positions (clauses you can live with if you have to), and a Not acceptable position (your red line).
RuleInside a Position, a Rule is a specific, testable condition. A Position is made up of one or more Rules; together, the Rules define what the Position means.
A quick example. For the Topic Working hours in an employment contract, your Acceptable position might consist of two Rules:
  • Weekly working time does not exceed 40 hours.
  • The agreed gross monthly salary compensates for no more than 10 overtime hours per month.
Together, those two Rules describe what an acceptable working-hours clause looks like for you. Libra checks the contract against the whole framework and tells you, Topic by Topic, where it passes and where it falls short. You’ll learn how to build templates in Review templates. Once a template is built, you can run it against any contract of that type.

Two ways to start a Review

The most common path is from a template: you’ve built a template (yours or your firm’s) for the kind of contract you’re reviewing. Open the Review section in your project, pick the template, attach the document, and run. The fastest path is from Chat: drop the contract into a chat and ask Libra to “review this against our standard NDA terms”. Libra recognises the intent, runs a Review using the matching template, and shows the result inline. See Reviews from chat.

What you get back

A Review result is structured, not narrative. Topics across the top, with a risk badge each. Click any Topic to expand its Positions and Rules.
ElementWhat it tells you
Topic risk badgeA summary level (No risk, Medium risk, or High risk) for the whole topic.
Position matchFor each Position, how many of its rules the contract satisfies (e.g. “Full match 2/2”, “Partial match 1/3”, “No match 0/2”).
Rule reasoningFor every Rule, Met or Not met, with the reasoning Libra used and citations back into the contract.
CitationsNumbered references you can click to jump to the exact passage in the contract.
See Understanding Review results for how to interpret each part.

When to use Review

A new draft of a contract you've negotiated before

The fastest way to spot deviations from your standard positions on a redline.

A document you receive from the other side

Run a Review to see at a glance which Topics need a redline, and where the deviations actually sit.

A first pass on a high-volume queue

Reviews are deterministic and consistent. Run the same template across many contracts to triage which ones need a partner’s attention.

A research-grounded check

With Auto Mode, ask whether a clause matches current case law without having to draft the rules first.

Review vs. Discovery

Both extract structured information from documents, but they answer different questions.
ReviewDiscovery
FocusDoes this contract meet our standards?What are the values across many contracts?
DocumentsOne contract at a time.Many documents in parallel.
OutputPer-Topic risk + rule-level reasoning.A spreadsheet, one row per document.
Best forNegotiation, redlining, compliance checks.Comparison, data extraction, portfolio analysis.
When in doubt: if the question is “is this one contract OK?”, run a Review. If the question is “how do these many contracts compare?”, run a Discovery.

Tips for getting good Reviews

A template with a couple of well-defined Topics gives you cleaner output than a sprawling template that tries to cover everything. Add Topics once you trust the basics.
“Weekly working time does not exceed 40 hours” is a rule. “Working time should be reasonable” is not. Specific, testable, unambiguous.
For Acceptable and Fallback positions, you can attach an Ideal Language snippet: the wording you’d accept. The Word add-in uses it to suggest concrete edits.
Citations are the verification path. Click through to the cited passage and confirm Libra read the contract correctly.

Next steps

https://mintcdn.com/libra-4206ec93/FEijtikHu0E9u97G/images/icons/review.svg?fit=max&auto=format&n=FEijtikHu0E9u97G&q=85&s=041aba003a5ab901c7ac2a2970047d0d

Build a Review template

Topics → Positions → Rules → Ideal Language.

Auto Mode

Skip the rule-building and ask a research-backed question instead.

Understanding results

What the risk badges, match counts, and citations actually mean.
https://mintcdn.com/libra-4206ec93/FMkiM9fsFHVGUJwe/images/icons/chat.svg?fit=max&auto=format&n=FMkiM9fsFHVGUJwe&q=85&s=597400e2c39e03ffd2eb9dcab2a62882

Reviews from chat

Use a completed Review as context in a chat.