Skip to main content
When a Review finishes running, the result has the same shape every time. Once you can read one, you can read every Review, whether it has three Topics or thirty.
Libra mascot with a clipboard
Rule overrides save to the Review, not the Template. Flipping Not met to Met won’t bleed into other matters. Same rule overridden often? Fix it.

​
The four levels of a Review result

Review
└── Topic                  ← risk badge (No / Medium / High)
    └── Position           ← match count (e.g. Full match 2/2)
        └── Rule           ← Met / Not met + reasoning + citations
            └── Citation   ← link back into the contract
Every level is collapsible. Start at the top, expand only the Topics that need your attention.

​
Topic risk badges

Every Topic gets one of three risk levels.
BadgeMeaning
No riskThe contract meets the Acceptable position for this Topic. No action needed.
Medium riskThe contract meets a Fallback position, or has minor deviations from the Acceptable position. Worth a partner’s eye, but not a blocker.
High riskThe contract matches the Not acceptable position, or fails to meet any defined position. Negotiate.
The badge is a summary; Libra computes it from the underlying Position matches and Rule outcomes.
Sort or scan by risk first. A Review with twenty Topics is much less daunting when you start by reading the three High-risk ones.

​
Position match counts

Inside each Topic, every Position shows how many of its rules were satisfied by the contract.
Match labelWhat it means
Full match X/XEvery rule for this position is satisfied.
Partial match X/YSome rules are satisfied, others aren’t.
No match 0/YNone of this position’s rules apply.
Libra works through the positions in priority order:
  1. Did the contract get a Full match on the Acceptable position? → No risk.
  2. Did the contract get a Full match on a Fallback position? → Medium risk.
  3. Did the contract match the Not acceptable position? → High risk.
  4. Otherwise: partial coverage of one or more positions, surface the closest match → Medium risk.

​
Rule-level reasoning

Click into any Position and you see the underlying Rules. Each Rule is either Met or Not met, with reasoning. Position card expanded showing rule outcomes with reasoning and citation chips For example:
Rule 1: Weekly working time is between 40 and 50 hours. Status: Not met. Reasoning: The working time is not clearly defined in the employment contract. Without a definition, it may exceed 50 hours per week. Citations: §1, §2, §3, §4
Every reasoning paragraph is grounded in citations back to the contract. Clicking a citation jumps to the exact passage in the document.
When a rule comes back as Not met, always click through to the cited passage. Most disagreements between Libra’s reasoning and your judgment will be about what the contract actually says, and citations resolve that immediately.

​
Citations

Citations are how Reviews stay verifiable.
  • Numbered: Each citation has a number (e.g. §3 or §1.2) that you can match against the contract sidebar.
  • Clickable: Click any citation to open the exact passage in the document viewer alongside the Review.
  • Per-rule: Citations are scoped to the rule whose reasoning produced them, so you know exactly what evidence Libra used for each conclusion.
Review with citation clicked, showing cited passage highlighted in the document viewer

​
Auto Mode results

Topics in Auto Mode look slightly different. Instead of Position match counts, the Topic shows:
ElementWhat it shows
Risk badgeSame scale (No risk / Medium risk / High risk). Computed from the answer Libra gave.
AnswerA written paragraph or two that answers the Auto Mode Question.
Research citationsNumbered citations to legal databases (Wolters Kluwer, Otto Schmidt, Fedlex, etc.) that grounded the answer.
Document citationsNumbered citations to the contract passages the answer references.
A Review can mix Auto Mode and Rules-based Topics; both render in the same result with consistent risk badges. See Auto Mode.

​
Marking topics as you work through the Review

A Review is a working document, not a one-shot output. As you go through each Topic, you can mark where you’ve landed:
ActionWhen to use it
Mark as reviewedYou’ve checked the citations and you’re comfortable with Libra’s assessment.
Mark for revisionThe Topic needs a redline or a follow-up — you want it surfaced when you go back to the negotiation table.
These statuses sit at the Topic level, alongside the risk badge, so a colleague picking up the Review can see at a glance which Topics you’ve already worked through and which still need attention.

​
Editing results on the fly

Disagree with one of Libra’s rule outcomes? You can override it.
1

Click the rule

Open the Rule whose outcome you want to change.
2

Toggle Met / Not met

The status toggle in the rule card flips between Met and Not met.Rule card with status toggle being switched
3

Add a note (optional)

Add a short note explaining your override, useful for the next person who reads the Review.
4

The Topic risk re-computes

The Position match counts and Topic risk badge update automatically once you’ve overridden a rule.
Edits are saved on the Review, not on the template. Future Reviews using the same template start fresh from Libra’s reasoning.

​
Exporting a Review

The export button at the top of the Review opens a dialog with format options.
FormatBest for
PDFSharing with a client or counterparty. Preserves formatting.
WordEditing the result narrative or pulling sections into a memo.
ExcelTopic-level summaries for portfolio dashboards.

​
Tips for reading Reviews efficiently

Open the High-risk Topics first. Skim the Medium-risk Topics. Trust the No-risk Topics, but spot-check one or two for sanity.
If a Rule’s outcome surprises you, that’s exactly the rule whose reasoning to read in detail. The reasoning will either confirm Libra is right (and you’ve learned something) or reveal a misread you can override.
A Review is only as defensible as its citations. For client-facing or partner-facing work, click through every citation on the Topics you’re going to negotiate.
Overrides are useful but not a substitute for fixing the template. If you find yourself overriding the same rule on every Review, the template needs a tweak.

​
Next steps

https://mintcdn.com/libra-4206ec93/FMkiM9fsFHVGUJwe/images/icons/chat.svg?fit=max&auto=format&n=FMkiM9fsFHVGUJwe&q=85&s=597400e2c39e03ffd2eb9dcab2a62882

Reviews from chat

Use a finished Review as context in a follow-up conversation.
https://mintcdn.com/libra-4206ec93/FEijtikHu0E9u97G/images/icons/review.svg?fit=max&auto=format&n=FEijtikHu0E9u97G&q=85&s=041aba003a5ab901c7ac2a2970047d0d

Review templates

Tune the template if a result wasn’t what you wanted.